Suggested by IKnowledge. Robert Baratheon is a Game of Thrones character and that means that he is a warrior with little to no morals. He can fight to a decent extent, but he has trouble with other humans. He wouldn’t be able to last long against a beast who was even able to fight the King of the Monsters at one time. King Kong only needs one good hit to end this fight while Robert would need thousands. King Kong wins.
DReager1.com 
I still think the human King has a chance. If he can smash King Kong’s foot with the hammer, then Kong’s down for the count by a large margin.
I dunno, he’d need an incredibly strong hammer to deal any damage to King Kong and I don’t think he could physically lift such a hammer if it existed.
Baratheon is pooned by a wild boar. Guy is a noob.
Kong wins.
King Kong’s definitely tougher than a wild boar so this doesn’t bode well for Robert.
You all make good points, but Robert Baratheon was one of the most famous warriors of his day and age when he died too young by our terms. His hammer seemed that only he could lift, and he used it on horseback. Do you know how strong you have to be to fight with a Warhammer on horseback. He only died of the boar because he was drugged/drunk and he had let himself go to waste and not exercise. From how strong he was in life, that’s where I approached my conclusion.
Can King Robert injure Kong with his warhammer? If so, then he has a SLIGHT chance if he can get King Kong to fall over and let the square/cube law do the work.
Honestly I’m not sure if that would hurt King Kong at all. It may do some sleight damage I suppose, but I don’t think it would do enough to really matter in this case.
That’s exactly what logic I ran by for this battle.