Suggested by JordyPresto0418 Homelander is basically an evil version of Superman. His abilities are crazy powerful so most heroes wouldn’t really stand a chance against him. Fortunately for Superman he has a lot of experience dealing with guys who have this power set. He’s fought off alternate versions of himself a few times. Homelander would go in much the same way. As powerful as he is the guy can’t match up with Superman head to head unless his stats were to get a further boost. Mix in Superman’s martial art skills and that’s game over. Superman wins.
DReager1.com 
At least your right about this one
And gladly, Homelander a bitch
Cant wait to watch him die in the boys
But superman does win, and rather easily
First in strength, while homelanders strength feats are not displayed at its highest, superman’s strength is far beyond any of the boys’s abilities. Superman has benchpressed the earth, punched into reality, held up a book of infinite pages, and
overpowered darkseid, who as I always said before, threatens the universe, and probably multiverse.
In speed, homelander has been able to dodge lasers. but superman has kept up with the flash who can react down to attoseconds as I continue to mention throughout these debates…
In durability, homelander has survived a nuke, but superman has survived a supernova, 5 of them, all at once, to the face, and even greater. Homelander cannot put superman down so easily.
The fight could not be decided on arsenal considering how homelander and superman have similar abilities, though superman tends to use them way better then homelander.
In experience superman also beats him, while superman is theoretically unstoppable, he has taken up martial arts before and has learned from previous battles and his mistakes and losses.
Meanwhile homelander lives in a world where he is pretty much the strongest and never had to push himself to get stronger since he already was stronger from the day he was born. cause he was a lab experiment.
Superman shits on homelander like nothing.
When has Homelander survived a nuke, Wat? If this is based on the comment Madelyn made about human weapons being unable to kill him, then that’s going purely off of a statement that hasn’t been verified with a feat.
If there’s some other feat that I’m missing that backs this up, then I’d be interested to see it.
Well if he can survive any man made weapon then scaling his durability to survive the strongest nukes in all of man kind would be perhaps acceptable,
Sure this feat has not been shown all that often but the point is, I’m assuming this statement so then, if I can prove homelander can still lose to superman despite being immune to nukes, then his actual durability would 100% not hold up, still him being immune to every man made weapon should not be ignored, he could or could not, of course this has not been shown yet but lets face it, no way is any country gonna try to kill off homelander with a nuke if they kill off more lives in any surrounding city.
There are feats to back up homelander’s so called immunity to all man made weapons.
There not nearly close to a nuke, but still,homelanders immunity to this stuff cant be ignored entirely, maybe immunity to small to medium man made weapons, and a heavy resistance to the large and strong man made things like nukes and bombs.
Still why make a comment about this?
Cause either way, superman wins, with or without homelanders nuke surviving feat.
I could give homelander planetary durability for example but either way he would still lose.
Agreed Superman crushes this guy real quick. You can’t hope to beat the Man of Steel like this. Not without having incredible powers but Superman beats him around the board as you mentioned.
“Well if he can survive any man made weapon then scaling his durability to survive the strongest nukes in all of man kind would be perhaps acceptable,”
Without an appropriate scan, scene, video anything to show him surviving the impact of a nuke? No, no it’s not acceptable.
“Sure this feat has not been shown all that often but the point is, I’m assuming this statement so then, if I can prove homelander can still lose to superman despite being immune to nukes, then his actual durability would 100% not hold up, still him being immune to every man made weapon should not be ignored, he could or could not, of course this has not been shown yet but lets face it, no way is any country gonna try to kill off homelander with a nuke if they kill off more lives in any surrounding city.”
Most of this is irrelevant extra sentences that don’t address anything related to surviving nukes. And what you do mention does nothing to provide evidence of Homelander accomplishing any feat like this.
“There are feats to back up homelander’s so called immunity to all man made weapons.
There not nearly close to a nuke, but still,homelanders immunity to this stuff cant be ignored entirely, maybe immunity to small to medium man made weapons, and a heavy resistance to the large and strong man made things like nukes and bombs.”
Yeah nukes are on an entirely different level, utterly obliterating and vaporizing a shit ton of stuff around it in a massive area around it. The blast radius and overall damage is a lot compared pretty anything if not everything we see in The Boys. It’s on a totally different level to any guns in the show, or stuff like artillery, rocket launchers, tanks, or hell even that building sized explosion in the animated version of the show. It’s simply not on the same level.
“Still why make a comment about this?
Cause either way, superman wins, with or without homelanders nuke surviving feat.
I could give homelander planetary durability for example but either way he would still lose.”
Because it’s bullshit wank based on one statement made Madelyn that doesn’t ever seem to get backed up by any scans, videos or any sort of evidence of this feat being demonstrated and I despise it. And because I had to deal with some asshat on Reddit that refused to provide evidence of this and its made this particular supposed feat stick out for me ever since.
You stupid as hell for not understanding
Again Its something that of course has not been shown in the boys,yet. BUT if we were to take homelanders immunity as a Real feat, would I be wrong about the nuke explosion?
Afterall from what we have seen so far he has been immune to most of the man made things.
Anyway, like i said, i only assumed his immunity or resistance to all man made weapons as a high ball estimate, wether his ability to survive a nuke is still questionable
Sorry that i made you have a legit heart attack there when i said this.
“In durability, homelander has survived a nuke, but superman has survived a supernova, 5 of them, all at once, to the face, and even greater. Homelander cannot put superman down so easily.”
High balling is not too bad, especially if it can be used to further prove a point to another characters victory.
I know your looking for feats and all and like i said homelander has not survived a nuke yet, but what we do know is that in the comics he did have a hydrogen bomb strapped to him. Sure a hydrogen bomb is no where near the level of a nuke, but you get the idea, and again yes i know your gonna ask for it, no i do not know if homelander can survive it or not, just taking it into consideration as another feat for homelander.
But the point is, even if we high ball homelander to nuke survivability, the victor won’t change. Superman far surpasses that, which surprises me by you not understanding.
thought you would for someone who supports the ger’s victory against sasuke.
Based on your whole argument with a guy on reddit, i can tell i touched a nerve of yours lol. Sorry about that.
If wat said he was assuming homelanders high durability feat then I don’t know where your get off on saying how bullshit it was for assuming it in the first place.
Superman claps either way.
If it’s only assumed then it’s not totally accurate to homelanders feat.
But it won’t matter if the assumed feat won’t change the outcome of the battle.
You every heard of high balling before?
“Again Its something that of course has not been shown in the boys,yet. BUT if we were to take homelanders immunity as a Real feat, would I be wrong about the nuke explosion?
Afterall from what we have seen so far he has been immune to most of the man made things.”
Are these man made things that he’s immune to anything close to nuke level destruction? No? Then everything you just said is entirely irrelevant
“Anyway, like i said, i only assumed his immunity or resistance to all man made weapons as a high ball estimate, wether his ability to survive a nuke is still questionable
Sorry that i made you have a legit heart attack there when i said this.
“In durability, homelander has survived a nuke, but superman has survived a supernova, 5 of them, all at once, to the face, and even greater. Homelander cannot put superman down so easily.”
High balling is not too bad, especially if it can be used to further prove a point to another characters victory.”
If the high balling goes from small arms and building sized explosions to nukes and apparently hydrogen bombs based on another paragraph? Then I’m not buying it. It’s simply too high of a jump without evidence. You know the thing we keep grilling Dreager for?
“I know your looking for feats and all and like i said homelander has not survived a nuke yet, but what we do know is that in the comics he did have a hydrogen bomb strapped to him. Sure a hydrogen bomb is no where near the level of a nuke, but you get the idea, and again yes i know your gonna ask for it, no i do not know if homelander can survive it or not, just taking it into consideration as another feat for homelander.”
Show a scan with a hydrogen bomb being strapped to him. Not engaging this point until you do. If it happened it really shouldn’t be that hard. Next.
“But the point is, even if we high ball homelander to nuke survivability, the victor won’t change. Superman far surpasses that, which surprises me by you not understanding.
thought you would for someone who supports the ger’s victory against sasuke.”
Did I ever say that I thought it changed the outcome? Or did you just assume that? This has absolutely nothing to do with whether Superman wins this. It’s composite fucking Superman including Cosmic Armor Superman ofc he wins. It’s silly that you assumed this when I made no statement of the sort. Do better. I don’t think even Dreager would make this mistake tbh.
Now moving on to the other comment
“If wat said he was assuming homelanders high durability feat then I don’t know where your get off on saying how bullshit it was for assuming it in the first place.
Superman claps either way.”
Again totally irrelevant whether Superman wins. He absolutely does. This is about getting evidence that Homelander can survive nuke level destruction based on tangible feats, scans etc. The fact I have to spell this out for you two is incredibly disappointing.
“If it’s only assumed then it’s not totally accurate to homelanders feat.
But it won’t matter if the assumed feat won’t change the outcome of the battle.
You every heard of high balling before?”
Same shit I said about high balling on Wat’s comment. High balling is not enough to accommodate the gap here. I want scans, feats, evidence. How difficult is this to do?
Am I seriously being treated as unreasonable or as Wat put it stupid as hell for asking for evidence that Homelander is capable of doing a feat?
Like do you hear yourselves right now? Literally all either of you had to do is provide any sort of scan showing what Homelander can do. And I would immediately be more inclined to agree with your arguments. But instead you pulled a Dreager Lite and provided nothing of the sort.
Ight then so you wanted a bit of proof
here
https://qph.cf2.quoracdn.net/main-qimg-fdc7eeb1fe1ba74b5656c535acc90de5-pjlq
Hyrdogen bomb strapped to his ass as stated there.
2nd
I never intended to include cosmic armour superman into the mix because that would be far too much of a overkill for this debate but go ahead and add it if ya want.
Now of course like I said before, Im not saying he CAN survive a hydrogen bomb, I’m only saying that he MAY BE ABLE TOO.
3rd of all the difference between me and dreager is that dreager pointing out ger’s energy limits was fated to fail, cause there’s no actual evidence in the first place to prove this, Went across the whole internet but nothing came up. BUT in this case, there’s 2 pieces of evidence that may point to homelander’s immunity or resistance to all man made things, the quote from madelyn and the hydrogen bomb.
AT least there is SOME evidence of homelander’s possible immunity or resistance to man made weapons, whereas with ger, there’s nothing to prove ger’s rtz limit, but there is a bit of proof for ger actually having unlimited energy.
Dreager is a dude who created this whole ass website most likely for the trolls, I too don’t believe someone is this idiotic to think a Pikachu would win against a giant space kaiju.
The whole point of this vs matchup was to see who wins between superman and homelander. Me and you both agree that superman would shit on homelander.
Dreager too but he is probably biased at this point.
and by one phrase “homelander has survived a nuke” The debate takes a completely different turn into a direction that has no purpose of discussing. It does not matter if homelander can survive a nuke or not.
If you wanna argue about homelander’s immunity to man made weapons or not, this ain’t the place, you can go back to reddit and talk to the guy you mentioned there. This argument here would only make sense if i was claiming that homelander could beat superman or i said that homelander’s durability beats superman durability, but of course i deny both, but you right now are making a pointless debate that wont change anything, all your doing is wasting your time on a debate that’s never gonna end because you keep trying to prove homelander’s durability.
I gave you the evidence you wanted, if that link don’t work let me know and i can get you a new one, agian only assuming homelander can survive this hydrogen bomb, its possible, but not 100% legit.
Why did i highball homelander’s durability to a nuke? because a nuke is a man made thing, and if his immunity or resistance to all man made weapons is true then a nuke he could probably survive. I never took guns or building sized explosions into account because those things are roughly weak man made weapons compared to the hydrogen bomb or nukes i mentioned, when i said it was a high ball estimate, i meant it. And like i already fucking said, I’m not taking it into his actual durability. assuming that it is, it won’t change shit about who wins.
You provided the scan I wanted. Literally all I want was evidence of what you were talking about. Now that you’ve done so, it’s over.